FanHouse

Cal's Hippiegate Gets Worse

About a month ago word came down that Cal's planned athletic facilities upgrade had been temporarily halted by literally tree-hugging hippies. Apparently the hippies' legal counsel was wiser than their hairstylists -- white male dreadlocks were regrettably prominent -- and managed to get the facilities delayed based on some obscure seismic statutes. Everyone was duly pissed off and waited for the next shoe to drop.

That shoe appears to be an 80-year old archaeological report featuring one skeleton and one 19th century Mexican coin:
he protesters, who have been roosting in the oak grove since Dec. 2, pointed Tuesday to a UC archaeological survey from 1925 stating that human remains were removed from the area when the stadium was constructed.

"I think this is a significant find and the area should be protected," said Stephan Volker, attorney for the California Oak Foundation, one of four groups suing UC over the proposed renovation of Memorial Stadium and construction of the $125 million sports training center.
Cal blog Tightwad Hill sees through this obvious load of crap and is unamused:
In reality, what the anthropologist in question found was a partial skeleton and a Mexican gold coin dating from the 19th century - but please don't pay attention to the facts. After all, the facts don't really matter - the hippies have another interest group to drag up into the trees and yell into bullhorns. What they lack in gainful employment is more than matched, I'm sure, by their energy and enthusiasm for civil disobedience.

Never mind that no one EVEN KNEW ABOUT THIS SO-CALLED REPORT until the lawyer for the hippies dug it up and shopped it around. It's still very sacred, I'm sure. Break out the smudge sticks and the burning sage, and let's party! Sorry if you think I'm being flippant, but this is the worst sort of opportunism. This 1925 report has yet to be corroborated by any other source. Ken Lightfoot - who as the head of the UC Museum of Anthropology, knows a thing or two about the subject - is unimpressed and says the skeleton's ethnicity is undetermined.
It would only be flippant if there was the slightest shred of evidence that this 1925 report was relevant to anyone except unemployed people with awful hair and kickin' lawyers.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Fantasy Football
ADVERTISEMENT