There were plenty of selections on my all-time Steelers ballot that caused disagreement, but one of the biggest bones of contention was my comment that Franco Harris ranks ahead of Jerome Bettis if you're ranking all-time Steelers running backs.That got me thinking, and led me to fire up the DVD player and re-watch some of Harris' games from the 1970s to compare him to the Bus. Hey, it's the dead period of the offseason, so this is the most interesting Steeler stuff to talk about.
Here's my admittedly unscientific take on how the two compare:
The Stats: Harris had seven 1,000 yard seasons while Bettis had eight. Bettis' best season (1,665 yards in 1997) was better than Harris' best (1,246 yards in 1975), but Harris spent half of his career playing 14-game schedules, and backs in the 1970s had to share their carries, something Bettis never had to deal with. Their final stats offer arguments for both backs--Bettis' 13,662 yards tops Harris' 12,120, but Harris' 4.1 yards per carry tops Bettis' 3.9. Amazingly they both finished with 91 career rushing touchdowns. Edge: Push.
Inside the Tackles: Franco Harris was quite comfortable running inside, as the Steelers relied on quick hitting traps during the Chuck Noll era. And at 227 pounds, he was as big as many linebackers and not much smaller than some defensive ends, which gave him the size to break tackles. But he often would sidestep contact, so it's hard to give him too much credit as bruiser. Bettis is one of the all-time greats in moving the pile, and he has to rank among the top 10 backs that linebackers hated to see breaking through the line with a full head of steam. Bettis relished contact, which explains why he became a goal line back in his final two seasons. Edge: Bettis.
Outside Running: In his prime, Bettis' quick feet allowed him to do better on outside runs than one would expect, but he was vulnerable to getting strung out. If Bettis was running from side to side, defenses counted it as a victory. While he had quick feet, he wasn't a cutback runner and he couldn't slide through a tiny hole. Some of Franco's best runs came when he would take a handoff on a sweep, string out the defense, find a small hole and then cutback for a big gain. Harris was a bigger big-play threat than Bettis throughout his career. Edge: Harris.
Ball Security: With the Steelers' ball control offense (both in the 1970s and 1990s), having a feature back who can hold onto the ball was key. Harris was prone to putting the ball on the ground, while Bettis would go weeks without a fumble. Harris fumbled 90 times in a 13-year career while Bettis fumbled only 41 times in the same number of seasons. Edge: Bettis.
Receiving: Running backs in the 1970s weren't used to running many routes more than 15 yards downfield, but Harris was a key part of the Steelers' passing attack, as evidenced by his average of 23 catches and 175 receiving yards a season for his career. Pass catching might have been the biggest weakness in Bettis' game. He simply didn't have soft enough hands to be a threat in the passing game. Wisely the Steelers never asked him to stay in on third down. He never had more than 125 yards receiving in a season as a Steeler. Edge: Harris.
Lasting Memory: Harris has the Immaculate Reception, simply the greatest play in the history of the NFL. Bettis has the Steelers improbable run to Super Bowl XL, allowing Bussy to return home for a Super Bowl title in his final season. As amazing as that was, the Immaculate Reception will still be shown in highlights in the year 3007. Edge: Harris.
Fan Favorites: Jerome Bettis was "The Bus," one of the best nicknames in NFL history. Franco had "Franco's Italian Army," one of the great fan clubs of all time that even included the Chairman of the Board Frank Sinatra as a member. Edge: Push.
Awards: Harris was named to nine Pro Bowls and was a first or second-team All-Pro six times. He also was named the Super Bowl IX MVP. Bettis earned six trips to Hawaii, was the NFL Comeback Player of the Year in 1996 and was named the NFL Man of the Year in 2002. Edge: Harris.
Leadership: Harris was known as an all around great guy, but he was more of a quiet leader than the emotional center of the 1970s Steeler (that role fell more to Joe Greene). Bettis was the focus of the Steelers run to Super Bowl XL because everyone on that team respected him so much. Edge: Bettis.
The Scorecard: On this scorecard Harris has won four categories while Bettis has won three. As I said when I voted for the all-time team, I'd give Harris the slightest edge because he was a more all-around running back with better big-play ability, but I'd be thrilled with either guy in the Steelers backfield.

Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 1)
1. I would take Harris slightly over Bettis as a Steeler for two reasons. (#1) Harris won 4 superbowls Bettis won 1.(#2) Bettis started his career with the Rams and I believe Harris had more rushing yards as a Steeler . (#3) Harris post season career was better "The Immaculate Reception" will make Harris an Alltime Great in Pittsburg 4 ever. Both Men were Hall of Fame Players on and Off the Field. I would love to have Bettis or Harris on any team that I coached!
Posted at 2:33AM on Jun 28th 2007 by rogerg591
2. Nice work.
Interesting take on the "inside the tackles" part. I wonder who your top 10 would be for the guy who LB's hated to see breaking through the line with a full head of steam?
10 HERSCHEL WALKER
9 CRAIG HEYWARD
8 LARRY CSONKA
7 MIKE ALSTOTT
6 JEROME BETTIS
5 BO JACKSON
4 JOHN RIGGINS
3 CHRISTIAN OKOYE
2 EARL CAMPBELL
And number 1.....
THE FRIDGE!!! (Does he count?)
Posted at 9:47AM on Jun 28th 2007 by The U will be BACK!
3. interesting that you count bettis being more of a "workhorse" back against him. you might argue that bettis was more valuable because he WAS the ground game. with harris, they could use frenchy or bleir in relief.
some of the earlier commenters point to harris as being superior because he was on more super bowl winning teams but i think that might be backwards. should bettis get more credit for his accomplishments as a steeler than harris because he often had lesser teammates around him?
it's one thing to be as great as harris was with a hall of fame QB, 2 hall of fame WR and a hall of fame center as your teammates. it's another when tomczack-stewart-graham-maddox-rookie roethlisberger are your QBs. i think it's safe to say that bettis faced alot more 8- and 9-man fronts than harris did in his career.
also, though it didn't happen when he was a steeler, bettis was rookie of the year.
when i started writing this comment, i wasn't sure who i thought was better. i guess now i'd have to say that bettis gets my vote, though as you said, either is a great player.
Posted at 12:09PM on Jun 28th 2007 by Luz
4. Excellent analysis. Thanks for giving us something to think about during the "dead period" of the off season.
Posted at 1:08PM on Jun 28th 2007 by Tony
5. Give me Bettis, he had nothing around him, while Harris' teams were loaded.
Posted at 1:25PM on Jun 28th 2007 by nfl picks for free
6. Love Franco, but I gotta go Bus on this one. There ain't nothing better than watching him run over Brian Urlacher in the snow (Bus had his snow tires on that day)...in his 30's no less...
Posted at 4:25PM on Jun 28th 2007 by Cotter
7. I believe Franco Harris had more rushing yards as a Steeler because Bettis playing his 1st part of his career with the Rams. Dont forget Harris won 4 superbowls to Bettis who had one! Close call though both backs were great men on and off the field. I would probably by a razor thin margin have chosen Harris also but would loved to have either man on my team.
Posted at 3:27AM on Jun 29th 2007 by rogerg591