I hate pretense. It's something that almost ruins NCAA athletics for me. Everybody carries on like Division I athletes are amateurs, that everyone follows an archaic recruiting guidebook, that no one cheats or slips people a little money here and there. None of it's true, of course, and it's people that argue for the NCAA in comparison to, say, the NBA, that spout that convenient and annoying tripe. At least in the NBA, there is no pretense of amateurism. People are paid what the market (either rightly or wrongly) values them, something the NCAA will never do for its thousands of revenue-generating athletes. Which is all a long way of saying: I hate pretense. The same issues infect the MLB All-Star Game, making it an almost painful experience sometimes. I love the idea of the game: these are the world's best baseball players (or most of them, anyway) competing on one field one time a year. There's something special about that.
What's not special is that Major League Baseball and Bud Selig, embarrassed by the tie-game debacle in 2002, have suddenly contrived "meaning" for the game -- the league that wins gets home-field advantage for the World Series. This is supposed to make players care about playing, but has the net effect of making me care far less about the actual game.
Sorry, folks, but your average All-Star doesn't care about home-field advantage in the World Series. At least half of these guys have no chance at being part of the World Series this year; why would they play balls-out, risking injury, in a game that doesn't matter to them? The All-Star game is a break, a chance to schmooze with fellow superstars, a nice way of creating revenue for a specific club ... but it is not the hotly contested, hang-on-every-pitch experience Bud Selig wants you to think it is. Don't buy in.
Instead, focus your attention on the Home Run Derby. Everyone realizes what they're dealing with when players throw their caps on backwards and head to the plate -- the Derby is America's chance to sit back, mute Chris Berman, and watch a feat of athleticism that never, ever gets old. Players don't take it too seriously, but they try to give the fans a show. What results is the perfect balance of throwaway entertainment and celebration of baseball prowess, something the All-Star game tries to be but isn't.
So don't be fooled: the players don't care about home field advantage in the World Series. If you enjoy the game, then by all means watch. But don't believe the silly lie that the game matters in any sort of competitive sense. That's pretense at its peskiest.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-09-2007 @ 10:45AM
jerry e said...
why is not barry bond's in the home run derby?
not excuse's--shame on him-
when he breaks the record everyone will make a big deal out of it.
Horray for Hank Arron-not steroids.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 3:09PM
Unsilent Majority said...
HOW CAN U HA8TE PRESENTS?...THEY AR TOTALY TEH BEST!!!
/Generic AOL Commenter
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 3:15PM
Brian said...
Most NCAA fans don't hold that illusion. They just think their game is better.
The NBA is better than college basketball, but it's not because they're more "honest" about their game. It's just a better game.
College football (in my eyes) is better than the NFL, and it's because of the quality of the game and the pageantry, not some amateur illusion.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 3:21PM
ray said...
yea watching a bunch of guys take batting practice is real entertaining. i suppose i should just drop the pretense and admit that.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 3:27PM
Unsilent Majority said...
What Brian said
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 3:30PM
PostmanE said...
Oh, Unsilent. You slay me.
Not like that.
Reply
7-09-2007 @ 3:31PM
PostmanE said...
Brian:
I think most *intelligent* fans think like you do. But a lot of other people seem to genuinely hate the NBA (this problem doesn't really apply to the uber-popular NFL, I suppose) for a lot of reasons other than the quality of play, or the tempo, or the pageantry of college athletics or whatever -- they seem to hate it because everyone is a "thug" or uneducated or whatever else.
I didn't make it clear enough: I love NCAA athletics, particularly college basketball, and I love the NBA too. I just don't like the argument that college sports have some sort of moral superiority related to higher education, etc. And I don't like the idea that college athletes generate millions in revenue for only the price of a college education, something that isn't worth near the amount of money they could make in an uncontrolled market. This is a pretty unsophisticated view, I know, but it stems from a weird gut feeling every time I hear people talk about the sanctity of NCAA sports. Everyone cheats -- I guess I'd feel better if that was admitted more openly. But it doesn't affect my view of the actual contests, which are incredibly enjoyable for me, and probably always will be.
Reply
7-11-2007 @ 3:03AM
jerry said...
I don't find the Home Run Derby to be more interesting than the game itself, so screw your blog.
Reply