FanHouse

Is Michael Vick Controversy Driven by Race? This Blogger Thinks Not

One of the horrible by-products of this entire Michael Vick controversy is the perception by some fans that it has been driven by race. It's easy for me (I'm Native American for those of you that care to know) to shoot down the race card, but that clearly hasn't been enough in some cases.

After the most recent discussion, which became very racist, I began wondering what some Black bloggers around the net thought. Fueled by that curiosity, I caught up with Bijan Bayne, who writes for No-Huddle Offense, Outside Radio and various other sites.

Benton: "Many people feel like the hysteria surrounding Michael Vick is driven by race. Given what you've seen and read, do you feel the same way?"

Bayne: "I don't think the accusations are race-driven, as they are about a specific investigation and raid on the property of a player in a sport that is majority black. And he does own the buildings and land in question (as opposed to a general accusation about a phenomena such as steroid usage in baseball, where apparently more than one person, black, white and Latino, may have done so)."
Dan: "I know there are many variables that go into this question, but do you believe Michael Vick is guilty of having knowledge of the dog fights? Do you believe he took part in organizing or betting on the alleged fights?"

Bayne: "I don't have enough information about Vick's hobbies and interests to know if Vick knew or took part, or [enough to] form a strong opinion thereabout. Witnesses would have to come forward and speak to that, or fellow players who have heard him speak of such. Again, it's not like HGH or PED usage where we can look at circumstantial evidence like performance after age 37, dramatic weight gain, or hair loss."
Dan: "Should it be proven Michael Vick is guilty of playing any role in the dog fighting ring, what do you think his punishment should be?"

Bayne: "If it is proven Vick was aware of the proceedings, the penalty should be decided by a jury of magistrate in that jurisdiction of Virginia, based on animal treatment precedent. Unless you mean NFL or team penalty (which is up to those bodies)."
Dan: "Do these accusations take away from the significant charity work Michael Vick has already done?"

Bayne: "Does a negative act affect or take away from one's philanthropic efforts? The charity work one has done stands on its own, as well as the poor decision's one has made; whether one is an athlete or not. The good can neither erase the bad nor the bad the good, although judges take character references and character testimony into account. Depending on the gravity of the offense of course, as premeditated murder, child abuse, certain other things are unacceptable in our society even if the culprit founded The Boys Scouts of America or UNICEF."
Once again, a special thanks to Bijan Bayne for taking the time to sit down today. Hopefully this will help erase some of the racism and suggested racism that surround this entire situation.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 19)