FanHouse

By Sponsoring Dog Fights, Did Falcons' QB Michael Vick Violate NFL Gambling Rules?

The indictment of Falcons quarterback Michael Vick on conspiracy charges related to a dog fighting ring run on his property alleges that Vick provided the "purse" to the owners of the winning dogs. For instance, Page 13 of the indictment says this:

In or about March of 2003, VICK retrieved a book bag from a vehicle containing approximately $23,000 in cash. The cash was provided to [a confidential witness working with the feds] as payment for winning both dog fighting matches.

To the average observer, electrocuting a dog or killing a dog by slamming it to the ground would seem like a worse offense than gambling. But in the NFL, gambling is a much more serious offense than dog fighting or animal cruelty. If the NFL investigates and concludes that a $23,000 payment to the owner of the winning dog was a form of banned gambling, Vick could face league discipline no matter how the dog fighting investigation is resolved.

I contacted the NFL to ask whether that would constitute a violation of the league's gambling ban; the league's only response was its prepared statement.

Elsewhere on FanHouse:
Full Michael Vick coverage
Michael Vick Suspension Talk Heating Up
Report: Michael Vick 'Devastated'
NFL on Michael Vick: 'We Are Disappointed ... Guilt Has Not Yet Been Proven'

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)