It's generally accepted that somebody -- anybody -- is going to give Alex Rodriguez his gajillions this offseason. After all, Scott Boras is no dummy, and if he didn't think he had a deal already out there, would he have left the Yankees in such a hurry? A-Rod's going to get his, even if he's really not worth that much money. So The Hardball Times' John Brattain writes a little go-to memo for general managers considering an A-Rod signing. Among the talking points: A-Rod isn't likable, he isn't marketable, he's slowing down with age, and his recent numbers are comparable to players who receive significantly smaller contracts. In other words, this isn't 2000 anymore:
"In July 2008, Alex Rodriguez will be a 33-year-old average fielding third baseman who will likely have to switch to LF/1B/DH in the very near future. His level of offensive production is right around David Ortiz and Chipper Jones levels although your client is more durable. To be perfectly honest, he isn't well thought of among a lot of fans. They don't like him in Texas, and they really don't like him in New York at this moment. After the Red Sox won the World Series, Boston fans were chanting that they preferred Mike Lowell to Rodriguez."Brattain's is a pretty airtight case, but that doesn't mean GM's will utilize it. Boras will drive up the price, make fake offers from general managers that may or may not exist, and generally play the system better than the system does. The notion that a general manager could put together such a reasoned, intelligent, and stern response to Scott Boras and Alex Rodriguez ... I welcome it with open arms, even if I don't believe it.
"Quite frankly, while Alex has kept his nose clean for the most part, he is generally perceived as being as phony as a three-dollar bill. This isn't Michael Jordan or Wayne Gretzky you're selling here. Ortiz is on a whole different level of marketability; 'Big Papi' is better liked, is now a World Series legend and makes $13 million a year. [...]
"When you consider that A-Rod will make most of his money with his bat, well, there are 10 hitters in his neighborhood-are any of them looking for a 10-year/$300 million contract? Of course not. That's absurd. [...]
"His bat isn't worth $300 million-the market tells us that. A-Rod's post season performance isn't worth $300 million-he has yet to play in a World Series game. Alex's image isn't worth $300 million-a lot of people tell us that. [...] "Let's be more realistic here and start again, shall we?"

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-02-2007 @ 3:42PM
Bob said...
As long as there are people like Tom Hicks out there Boras will find A-Rod his $300 million. Funny thing is I was sure the Yankees wetre going to offer $30 million each for a five year extension. The same for 10 years (three years beyond said extension) is not that much of a stretch if you want homerun #800 in Yankee pinstrips. Do you think George does? What was the Toledo Mud Hens offer?
Reply
11-02-2007 @ 4:26PM
Martin said...
A top-10 pitcher has generally more impact on a team's record and is generally more valuable than a top-10 hitter. I question whether any team will be willing to plunk down as much money as A-Rod is demanding on a hitter when one can obtain two top-10 pitchers for the same amount.
Reply
11-03-2007 @ 2:56PM
dirty faces said...
please don't forget how much we hate him up here in seattle!!!
Reply
11-04-2007 @ 10:12PM
Teresa McVay said...
I truly hope no one will pay him or anyone else, that kind of money. Other players have comparable numbers, but aren't being ridiculous. Tell him Japan is a viable option. I'll bet he has a yen to go there
anyway. Please take that jerk Boras with you!!
Reply
11-15-2007 @ 8:14AM
Dan Robinson said...
If Scott Boras is marketing A-Rod as a financial "Rainnmaker" than maybe he should consider a percentage of the gate instead of up front cash.
Reply