
You won't see many kicks like Phil Dawson's as the clock ran out in regulation. It hit one upright, ricocheted off the back of the crossbar and back out. The crowd went wild, the Ravens went wild and Baltimore's playoff hopes were jolted back to life. But just for a second. The kick hit a part of the crossbar that was through the uprights and the Browns protested that the call was wrong. The officials conferred and ruled that the kick was good. That sent the game to overtime where Dawson plugged another kick, in more conventional style, and won the game 33-30 for the Browns.
Here's the rub. Field goals aren't reviewable plays and the kick was ruled no good by one official in the end zone while the other one saw it good. Referee Pete Morelli brought them together and, after much deliberation, called the kick good. Morelli termed it a discussion between the officials, as opposed to a review (it appeared that he did give the play a look on replay but NFL Head of Officiating Mike Periera said he didn't, according to Bill Cowher on CBS), and they ended up getting the call right. I doubt Brian Billick takes much comfort from that, however.
The confusion was fitting on an afternoon overflowing with miscues by both teams and the officiating crew.
The Browns went to the locker room after the first half with a 13-7 lead despite turning the ball over twice, missing a field goal and committing a ridiculous six penalties, including four false starts, on one drive. The Ravens, however, were up to their old tricks. Kyle Boller was picked and fumbled, kick returner Cory Ross added another fumble and the offense mustered a grand total of two first downs before the break.
The Browns didn't turn that poor play into enough points, however, and Baltimore's offense in the second half looked better than it has all year. Boller hooked up with Devard Darling for 107 yards and a touchdown, Willis McGahee ran 14 times for 85 yards and they erased a 13-point Browns lead over the last 13 minutes. Then they made another mistake -- they kicked to Joshua Cribbs. After Matt Stover put them up 30-27, the explosive Brown returner returned the kickoff 39 yards to the Cleveland 43. Two Derek Anderson passes set up Dawson's eventful tying kick.
The same thing happened after Cleveland won the OT coin toss. Cribbs busted a 41-yard return to put the Browns in business and nine plays later the Browns had a sweep of the season series. To keep their playoff push alive, however, they need to start playing with more care. They had 12 penalties, those two turnovers and allowed the Ravens to hang around when they should have put their lights out in the first half.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-18-2007 @ 7:07PM
Browns Win? said...
Did the official review the play or not?
He announced that he was going to review the play.
If he did, does that mean that the win for Cleveland is subject to protest by Baltimore?
Can a game be sucessfully protested and overturned?
Reply
11-18-2007 @ 7:26PM
rebelkat said...
It was reviewed on the field & determined to be a good field goal. The final call was not made until after discussion. So it was not overturned call...just a correct call.
Reply
11-18-2007 @ 8:01PM
paul said...
Actually this game was lost for the Ravens by some incredibly stupid play calling by Brian Billick. Billick passes when he should run; to burn some time off the clock. Had he really known what most seasoned coaches know, the game may have ended much differently. Why Baltimore fans like this guy I don't understand. He will probably lose his job this year. About six years too late. He really doesn't know what he is doing.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 7:55AM
Dave C said...
I think the NFL should consider changing the rules for field goals next year. If the ball hits any part of the goal post ,it's no good . Just like when a receiver's foot touches the line on an otherwise spectacular catch.That kick of Dawson's should not have counted it was such a sloppy lucky play.Although it made Billick mad so I totally enjoyed it this time.I just so happen to dislike the Ravens more than the Brownies.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 9:36AM
Scott Sargent said...
Upon further discussion, kicking the ball to Josh Cribbs is just a bad idea.
Reply
11-19-2007 @ 12:15PM
Elsquare said...
It seems to me things were handled correctly, and the field goal was good. The Browns appear to be imroving steadily on offens and on defense; but more slowly on defense.If Romeo Crennel will let Derek Anderson do what he does bes, which is throw the long pass, The Browns havae an excellent chance to reach the play-offs. Be aggressive on offense and defense. Never, never just 'take what the defense gives you; and and never, never play'prevent defense'. Do what you want and make the other team adjust to you. Go Browns! AND: Way to go AOL.
Reply
11-20-2007 @ 12:15PM
Chris said...
Im not a fan of either team But I can tell you that The Kick was good it clearly was in and thru the posts. The big question here is If it hit the post and went out would you call it no good?? Same same
The rule should be that it Can Not hit the uprights at all for it to be called good or no good
There are no rules about the ball hitting the uprights Right??!!
Reply