FanHouse

Are Yankee Titles Tainted?

The question in the headline is being asked by the New York Post and others today in light of the Mitchell Report. From Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte to Glenallen Hill and Denny Neagle, Yankees of all different pinstripes have been accused of using performance enhancing drugs during the team's long run on top of the American League East and the rest of baseball. Is that tainted now that they've been painted with the steroid brush?

Not if you read anything in the report beyond the names of players accused of enhancing their performance. I'm not arguing any of these players didn't use steroids, mind you, just that the rabid focus on the names provided by the two witnesses who pretty much tumbled into Mitchell's lap like soused floozies at closing time at the local is missing the point. If you get beyond that and get to page 310 of the report, you'll find that Mitchell reports "the use of steroids in Major League Baseball was widespread."

If you're going to taint the Yankees, then you have to taint everything else in baseball during this time. No more or no less than any of the other teams and players in the league. You can't cherry pick the parts of the report you choose to believe. Either this was a systemic problem in Major League Baseball that hit every town from Atlanta to Seattle, maybe not Pittsburgh, or you reject it because all the new, circumstantial, evidence comes from hearsay provided by two men trying to stay out of jail. If you believe the former, as I do, the answer is about what baseball does now to fix it forever.

Read FanHouse's complete coverage of the Mitchell Report.
Sorry, No Photos

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)