ESPN.com's Bill Simmons published his annual NBA trade value column this morning. It's a heady task, leaving yourself open to endless criticism, pulling cohesive narrative value out of a glorified list of players. And hey, it's 7,000 words long, which has to count for something. All in all, a perennial must-read and wholly commendable.But Bill misses the pictures on a couple of big points, most notably his supposed forte -- contracts. He has a few facts on some contracts (Monta Ellis, for example) wrong, and he generally ignores the fact many of these players are due for new contracts in the next year or two (Rasheed Wallace, Luol Deng, Josh Smith). Actually, he addresses Deng's contract status... but ranks him incredibly higher than comparable players who have signed for smaller contracts than what Deng will command this summer. How do you spend all this time considering contracts and ignore the obvious contracts which are coming this summer?
There's also the concern of homerism which will always haunt writers who have publicly known geographic preferences. Simmons' lashing comes on placing Paul Pierce at #19 while Tracy McGrady rides at... #28. McGrady is two years younger, a slight notch more productive currently, is only owed a small margin more per year, and is off the books a year earlier than Pierce. And somehow Pierce's situation -- talent, contract, age -- is not only better than T-Mac's, but a large degree better? That's called shamrock-colored glasses, my friend.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-18-2007 @ 8:48PM
theomnivore said...
Pierce was the best player on a team that won a playoff series. T-Mac hasn't done that... with Yao. I don't care about production; I've given up on T-Mac until he wins meaningful games, something Pierce has already done.
Reply
12-18-2007 @ 10:07PM
bruce said...
The problem is that the T-Mac/Pierce issue doesn't match up to Simmons' own criteria, which is not about past winning but about who would trade to who. The Celtics would trade Pierce for T-Mac tomorrow. No way do the Rockets do that trade.
Reply
12-18-2007 @ 11:34PM
grover said...
Pierce has also shown a fire that T-Mac rarely has. Now, Pierce doesn't always apply that fire in the best way, but that's another story.
Reply
12-19-2007 @ 1:11AM
bonzi said...
You're forgetting the most important thing: durability. T-mac is always injured and has (had) chronic problems with his back. Pierce was stabbed and recovered miraculously fast and hasn't had a major injury since. When 100% healthy, McGrady is a better player. It's just that he's never at 100%. Also, Tracy is younger, but has also played one more season in NBA than Pierce.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 3:55AM
Nora said...
When McGrady actually helps his team out of the 1st round then there can be a debate. What is good about being a good individual player if you can't get out of the 1st round at least once?
Reply