FanHouse

Stop the (Word)Presses: Curt Schilling Has Thoughts on the Mitchell Report

It was only a matter of time until Curt Schilling's long, rambling dissertation made its way through the internet tubes to your frontal lobe. Attempting to ignore Schilling's thoughts about the Mitchell Report, Barry Bonds, Brian Roberts, Jose Canseco, the legal system, and much, much more, was a purely futile gesture. With that out of the way, we can take a look at what Schilling actually has to say. And in this case, well, it's Schilling, you know? After ripping Canseco as a baseball fraud, Schilling drops this graph:
Which in the end gets us here. Say what you want about Jose, and there are things I disagree with and think he's wrong about, but I have yet to find someone he's named who's NOT been guilty or tried to clear their name. The view I have on that is maybe a bit too simplistic but I look at it like this. If Jose had named me in his book, it would have taken about 20 minutes for me to issue a press release vehemently denying the allegations, which would have been as closely followed as possible by as large a legal action as I could have possibly taken to sue for slander, libel, defamation of character and anything else I'd have been able to legally do. It's either that, or I'm guilty. There is no gray area here, you either did, or you didn't and Jose, up through today, hasn't called out anyone that's sued his ass off for false representation, slander, libel or whatever you would do if someone said something like this about you, that you didn't do.
Curt might be missing a central tenet of the legal system here, which is that libel is very nearly impossible to prove in a court of law for "public figures." Baseball players, especially famous ones, are public figures. So "what I'd be able to legally do" boils down to "not much, dude," which is probably what A-Rod and everyone else's lawyers have told their clients.

That said, there's some value here: If you are on Canseco's sordid and thus far reliable list -- or, for that matter, Mitchell's -- you need to do something. It probably won't be a legal action, but it needs to be something more than weak denials and condescending appeals to a jilted public. Are you listening, Roger Clemens?
Sorry, No Photos

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)