After listening to Roger Clemens' denial of having ever used steroids, I wondered whether he'd repeat that statement under oath in front of Contress. As it happens, he won't get the chance, nor will any other player. From USA Today:There are no plans to summon Clemens or any other baseball player, Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) said, to the Jan. 15 hearing on steroids in front of the House Government Reform Committee.See, there's a fine line between turning this into a circus and turning this into a photo op -- clearly, the good representative from Virginia is only interested in the latter. I still have a hard time figuring out why the government is bothering with this at all, but at least we now know ahead of time that literally nothing interesting will come from these hearings. (That is, unless you like finger wagging, which Bud Selig has already started practicing.)
"We don't want to turn this into a circus," Davis said in a telephone interview Wednesday. "We just want to know what Major League Baseball plans to do about their problems. We understand the collective bargaining agreement complicates matters, but we'd like to see if they agree with Sen. Mitchell's recommendations, and move on."
Sorry, No Photos


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-20-2007 @ 5:09PM
jon said...
If you go after Barry then you have to go after everyone including Clemens. After seeing what has happened to Bonds I doubt if anyone will lie to congress
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 5:15PM
theomnivore said...
All of the bloggers on Fanhouse should do their homework before they start bashing Congress for getting involved in sports disputes. Both the NFL and MLB have received anti-trust exemptions from Congress. This means that they are allowed to enter into exclusive and anti-competitive contracts and use exclusive and anti-competitive practices, because of the nature of their business. Sports leagues are some of the only multi-billion dollar industries to receive these exemptions, and therefore, it is the job of Congress to make sure that the business practices of the leagues are not so egregious as to warrant a revokation of these exemptions. I know its easy/popular/lazy to bash politicians for every getting involved in an sports-related issue, but when it involves the operations and business practices of the leagues themselves, Congress has good reason to - at the very least - call some hearings to spend 1/2 a day investigating and forcing sports executives to testify under oath.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 5:28PM
frank said...
Roger will go from Cy Young to Siyanara (sic)
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 5:56PM
Fred C. Dobbs said...
well old Bud why not just go ballistic like Judge Landis and kick all on the list out of baseball for life and take away all records and awards, give Roger Maris his homer crown back and the hammer his as well, it doesn't matter if a guy is innocent or not in 1920 the blacksox were all found NOT guilty and got kicked anyway, so have at Bud that is your kinda of game..........Fred C. Dobbs
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 6:07PM
tedfio1 said...
Frank -
Now your stealing Gregg Nettles jokes in reference to Sparky Lyle?
Come on be original; don't cheat. At least cite Nettles for the joke.
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 6:37PM
Bob Vasseur said...
Half of these guys did it and half didn't but there is no way that any of them can prove beyond a reasonable doubt if they are guilty or not.In many cases it was for medical reasons (to improve healing from an injury). So what's the point!!
Reply
12-20-2007 @ 10:29PM
just wonderin said...
Of course Clemens won't be called...wouldn't want he to go down Bond's road and perjur himself,
Reply
12-21-2007 @ 12:49AM
LUTHER EADDY said...
I am anxious to know if its true that steroids greatly enhances an athlete's game,why are the most of thhese athletes who are accused or suspected of taking steroids are practically unknown?
Reply
12-21-2007 @ 1:05AM
Luther Eaddy said...
If I were accused of taking steroids,in my defense, I would say that , in the light of such rampant use of steroids, I only took the drug in order to level the playing field.
Reply
12-21-2007 @ 1:20AM
Luther Eaddy said...
Give Clemens and Bonds credit. If they did take steroids,they were'nt great players for only a year and then went "bellyup".
Reply
12-21-2007 @ 2:05AM
JKlicious99 said...
They aren't gonna take away any of these guys awards and titles. The damage is already done to all these guys that used performance enhancing drugs though. In the public eye(at least the majority anyhow), these guys cheated and their reputations will forever be tarnished. I tell my 9 year old son, who is into baseball, that all these guys like Bonds, Mcguire etc are cheats who decided to take a shortcut to greatness. They aren't role models for children and never will be. Those guys homerun records mean nothing to me now and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that.As far as Clemens goes, it says alot that he hasn't come out to defend himself in person. People don't wanna hear statements through his agent, they wanna hear it from his mouth. He's well on his way to having a "great" career ruined if he can't refute what the Mitchell report said.
Reply
12-21-2007 @ 9:47AM
Travis said...
Roger, take a lie detector test. Tony LaRussa's name should have been in the Mitchell Report also. His 2 biggest stars for years were pumping steriods, and Beastman even followed him to St Louis. LaRussa knew something was up, and kept his mouth shut.
Reply
12-21-2007 @ 6:02PM
ventures360 said...
Hey Congress--War in Iraq? Immigration? Priorities please.
Reply