After the Lakers won two straight NBA titles in the late-80's, their coach Pat Riley trademarked the phrase "three-peat" so he could cash in on merchandising associated with their third straight crown. The Pistons took them out in the Finals, though, and Riles had to wait for the Bulls to achieve the feat before seeing any return on his craftiness. The Patriots spit on that history. The New York Post reports this morning that the team has filed paperwork to
If you're a believer in hubris, you're probably dialing the phone to lay some heavy action on the Giants right now. They probably didn't need any more motivation to win on Sunday but, in a league where the puffery of defensive backs can lift the Patriots to one of their best performances of the year, anything's possible.
The Post, which attached an asterisk to the Patriots in the wake of Spygate, have filed their own

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-01-2008 @ 12:28PM
JAlper said...
Paul - Thanks for the heads up. My legalese isn't that strong.
Reply
2-01-2008 @ 1:06PM
Paul Cooper said...
Patents aren't trademarks and vice versa - you got it right in the first paragraph, Riley trademarked three-peat, but from then on you use patent. You can't patent a phrase whereas you can trademark a phrase (although there are rules about what type of words or phrases you can trademark).
What would be better is if the trademark application were signed by Rodney Harrison, rather than what's likely - the Pats legal counsel on behalf of the marketing dept.
Reply
2-01-2008 @ 3:41PM
tobrien28 said...
How do you trademark something you haven't accomplished yet? I think the Pats are a bunch of *ssholes anyway.
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 1:49PM
Rick said...
This site will be dedicated to the Pats... Once they win this evening.....
Reply
2-03-2008 @ 1:50PM
Rick said...
http://www.19W0L.com
This site will be dedicated to the Pats this evening... After they win
Reply
2-04-2008 @ 10:57AM
Ed said...
Ha!
Reply
2-09-2008 @ 4:07PM
Mike Nelson said...
Why didn't they just trademark 18-1 also?
Reply