McNamee's Syringes May Not Be Relevant - FanHouse - AOL Sports Blog

The Word:

McNamee's Syringes May Not Be Relevant

Brian McNameeThe news broke yesterday that Brian McNamee (pictured) had given federal prosecutors a smoking gun in the case against Roger Clemens: syringes, vials and gauze pads McNamee claims to have used while injecting Clemens with HGH in 2000 and 2001. Since all of those items are said to contain traces of Clemens' blood and HGH, the evidence should be indisputable, right?

Actually, no, not at all. The New York Times spoke with several legal and medical experts who claim that "evidence" doesn't really prove anything.
"You can test to figure out what the substance is, but you cannot figure out how old it is," Dr. Don Catlin, the former director of the Olympic testing lab at U.C.L.A., said in a telephone interview.

There is no way to date blood either, Catlin said, which means there may not be a conclusive way to establish that the syringes, vials and pads were from 2000 and 2001.
In other words, the blood could be from the injections of Lidocaine and B-12 that Clemens has admitted to and traces of HGH could have been added later. In addition, Clemens' lawyers would have a field day grilling McNamee about where these items were stored the last seven years. The average fan may have a hard time conjuring up reasons why McNamee would go such lengths to tarnish Clemens, but as Times points out, tracking the chain of custody of evidence is extremely vital in doping cases.

Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 1)