Snake Oil on the Recruiting Trail - FanHouse - AOL Sports Blog

The Word:

Snake Oil on the Recruiting Trail

Or... It's the economy recruiting, stupid!

Earlier today, FanHouse's own Brian Cook took aim at the nefarious dealings of the most evil man in college football: Nick Saban. It turns out that Saban is so unethical and dirty that he had the nerve to sign more than 25 players to his recruiting class, in excess of the NCAA imposed limit.

He then introduced third-hand evidence from an unnamed source (in an article behind a for-pay wall) claiming that some universities can make athletes qualify or not depending on whether they needed them too. "Jesus. That's truly filthy." Cook opined. While he never explicitly stated that Saban was engaged in the questionable practice, the implication is certainly there: using the practice of fudging qualifications to explain why Alabama's over-signings are actually hurting someone.
Around six guys who are playing for Alabama now or expect to be in the fall are going to be told to get bent by the time fall practice rolls around. . . . Some might argue that no one's really hurt by the practice of oversigning, but this shocking assertion from Bruce Feldman's latest post argues otherwise.
Now, Mr. Cook doesn't strike me as someone clueless about the way the world works with respect to recruiting, but it's worth taking a look at some of his comments.

Some ink was spilled complaining about how the recruiting rankings are crap because of over-signing. One is certainly entitled to that opinion, but to suggest that a one-recruit class with a five-star athlete is better than a class with 25 4-star athletes is pretty silly, and using the star-average metric leads to exactly that sort of silliness. Nevertheless, ranking recruiting is a frivolous pursuit to keep us busy while the lesser sports are conducting their seasons and it's hardly worth spending a lot of time debating which metrics are the best.

So, with that out of the way, let's get to the important stuff.

It's difficult to contemplate anyone supporting the qualifying of prospects who shouldn't be, or disqualifying those who shouldn't be disqualified. That said, the problem is not over-signing, it's the qualification process. The fact that the system can be gamed means that the system should be fixed. Over-signing is only one reason a coach might want to manipulate his qualifications. Obviously, absent any problems with the cap, a coach will want every single player he recruited to qualify. I'd guess we can all agree that if there is an academic qualification process, it should be followed and it should be uniformly applied to every prospective athlete.

Brian's post may have led some readers to believe that few teams actually over-sign recruits, or that Saban is one of the most egregious of the over-signers. Here are some numbers to put that in context: 28 D-IA teams signed more than 25 recruits in 2008. In other words, nearly a quarter of all teams over-signed. Only one conference (the WAC) had no teams that over-signed players. Nine teams signed 30 or more players and Army signed a whopping 37, 12 more than the 25-scholarship limit. Even Troy got into the act with 33 signees.

It's also not unique to the 2008 recruiting year. Clearly Brian didn't like having his team's coach called out, and he went to bat for Coach Rodriguez, defending him against the "snake oil" comment made by Purdue's Joe Tiller. Now he's saying that over-signing is what a real snake oil salesman would do, so let's take a look at Coach Rodriguez's recruiting numbers at WVU. In the six seasons from 2002-2007, Rodriguez signed fewer than 25 only twice (2004 and 2006), and on two occasions signed 33 (2002 and 2005). He signed 25 and 28 in 2003 and 2007 respectively. So, in 6 years of recruiting, Rodriguez sold snake oil (to use Cook's metaphor) half of the time.

So if, indeed, Saban is a bad person for over-signing these players, there are a lot of bad people in college football and Cook, if he were trying to be fair, should be leveling the same criticism at the likes of Troy, Army, and even his own beloved Rodriguez. (Of course, for a guy so interested in coaching ethics, he's written surprisingly little about the ethics of Rodriguez trying to weasel out of his contract buy-out after bolting for Ann Arbor, but that's another topic for another day.)

Back to the point: I would argue that over-signing isn't really a problem at all. Last year, Auburn greatly over-signed... but when August rolled around, they had exactly the right number of scholarshipped players on their roster. There are a lot of things that can lead to this sort of shrinkage. Academic disqualification, medical problems, early entries, team dismissals for rules violations, anything like that can change the numbers on a coach or a team, and over-signing is necessary to allow for these sorts of contingencies. These are the reasons why so many programs over-sign recruits.

Reader Comments ( Page 1 of 1)