FanHouse

On Patriots Spygate Story, Does Boston Herald's John Tomase Deserve a Break?

Over the last week I've heard from several people who think Boston Herald reporter John Tomase should have been fired -- not just forced to apologize -- for his February 2 story suggesting the New England Patriots had taped the St. Louis' Rams' walk-through practice before the 2002 Super Bowl.

So why wasn't Tomase fired? Tomase's friend Seth Mnookin makes the case for Tomase keeping his job, and it basically breaks down to this:

1. Tomase made clear that the taping was just an allegation from a source close to the team, not that the taping had definitely happened.
2. The Patriots didn't categorically deny the allegations.
3. Tomase's editors should have reined him in.


I don't buy 1 or 2. You can't just go printing every allegation you hear, and the main reason the Patriots didn't categorically deny is that Tomase didn't give them a chance: He told the Patriots about the story he was working on at a time when he knew perfectly well that they wouldn't have an adequate opportunity to respond.

But I do buy that Tomase's editors deserve a lot of the blame here, and that's the basic reason that I don't think Tomase should be fired. Tomase told the Herald's editors what he had, and the Herald's editors told him to go with it. The whole paper -- not just Tomase -- got the story wrong.

So does that mean the editors who approved the story should all be fired? It's understandable if people in the Patriots organization think so, but I don't. I tend to think that this was more a boneheaded organizational mistake than a malicious act, and as such the egg on the faces of the people at the Herald is enough of a deterrent to make sure it won't happen again.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Fantasy Football
ADVERTISEMENT