FanHouse

Jim Rice Is Very Comfortable Living in the Past, Thank You Very Much

It's always so much fun when old ballplayers feel the need to remind us that today's players couldn't carry their jockstraps. Especially when part of their argument seems to be that the current guys are more interested in promoting themselves at the expense of winning games.

That's part of Jim Rice's approach in an interview with the Watertown Daily Times. He slams today's MLB as being watered down by too many teams and says that of the current Red Sox, only Jonathan Papelbon would be good enough to replace the guy who played on the 1975 club. My immediate thought was that Rice was forgetting that he wasn't as good as Manny Ramirez but Rice has a nifty argument all lined up for that.

"I'm tired of people saying, 'Manny being Manny. It's not like I'd take my 11-year old kid to go out and watch 'Manny being Manny,' that's not baseball. (Sunday) he hit home run 501, but, even though he hit 501 they still almost lost the game. Did you see those two plays he made out in left field? Now, do you want your kid to be 'Manny being Manny' missing those balls?"

Rice, no great fielder himself, isn't nearly the hitter that Manny is and certainly wasn't in 1975. He could hit into a hell of a double play, though. Which is how you help teams win games! Or maybe Rice is just the self-serving one.


I'd love to meet the GM who prefers the Doug Griffin/Denny Doyle second base combo over Dustin Pedroia so I can sell him a bridge to Brooklyn. Mike Lowell is better than Rico Petrocelli and Cecil Cooper may be a better manager than David Ortiz (or might not) but he wasn't a better hitter.

No 1975 starter is better than Josh Beckett and, no matter how amusing you might find his name, Dick Pole wasn't a better pitcher than any of the guys the Sox have run through the back of the rotation. Daisuke Matsuzaka would probably have found a spot in their rotation too although the influx of players from Asia is probably part of that watering down Jim Rice hates so well.

The most amusing thing about the whole article is that most of it is about Rice's continuing failure to make the Hall of Fame. On top of the many legitimate statistical arguments against his candidacy, many feel that writers hold Rice's sourpuss and poor attitude against him in the voting. It's so hard to see where they'd get that impression.

(H/T BBTF)

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Fantasy Football
ADVERTISEMENT