As the Steelers go through the offseason, the biggest concern of every Steelers fan in the country is the offensive line. Short of Ben Roethlisberger riding helmet-less on a motorcycle again, there's nothing that worries Steelers fans more than the idea of the Steelers offensive line getting blown off the ball again in 2008.To get a better understanding of what went wrong in 2007, when Roethlisberger was sacked 53 times in 17 games, I went back and rewatched each and every sack of the 2007 season. It wasn't particularly fun, but it was pretty informative. We'll end up breaking down the sacks in countless different ways, but to start out this series, it's worth just spelling out who gave up the sacks.
But before we get to who's to blame, it's worth mentioning how the blame was metered out. Determining the man at fault for a sack is somewhat of an art more than a science. For each sack, I rewatched the play several times to note the amount of pass rushers, the type of pass rush (straight four-man rush vs. a safety blitz for example), where the pressure came from, and how long it took before Roethlisberger was hit initially. If one man was beaten initially to come in and hit or pressure Roethlisberger but another defender finished off the sack, I generally tried to credit the sack to the first man beaten, unless the initial rush had nothing to do with the sack (for example if an outside blitzer forced Roethlisberger to step up in the pocket, but he did and the rusher flew on by, but the center was then beaten for a sack, blame the center). And if two rushers shared a sack, or if a rusher flew between two uncovered offensive linemen, 1/2 sacks were awarded. If you have more questions about how I credited sacks, feel free to comment and I'll give more details.
So without further delay, here's the chart of who gave up the Steelers 2007 sacks.
| Player | Sacks |
| Willie Colon | 12 |
| Kendall Simmons | 10 |
| Marvel Smith | 7 |
| Sean Mahan | 6.5 |
| Alan Faneca | 5 |
| Trai Essex | 1.5 |
| Heath Miller | 1.5 |
| Max Starks | 1 |
| Matt Spaeth | .5 |
| No One | 8 |
Of Marvel Smith's seven sacks, three came in the regular season loss to the Jaguars, when a back injury forced him to leave the game. Take those away and Smith had a very solid year in pass blocking. Now the question is just whether his back injury is fixed by his recent surgery or if it will be a chronic problem throughout the rest of his career.
Considering how Sean Mahan is a giant punching bag for Steelers fans, I'm sure a lot of you are surprised he gave up only 6.5 sacks. Don't be. Mahan's biggest problems came in the running game. And as a center, 6.5 sacks is still what would appear to be a pretty high number. Against a standard four-man rush, the center is uncovered and only has to pick up a blitzer or help out in case of a twist or stunt. Against a three-man line, the center is lined up against a massive nose tackle who usually will be lucky to get a couple of sacks a year.
Ross Tucker, a former NFL offensive lineman who now writes for SI.com, explains it this way:
Most centers go through an entire season without giving up any sacks and are rarely credited with even being responsible for a pressure.That's not Mahan. He gave up more sacks than Faneca and nearly as many as the team's left tackle. That's a pretty brutal performance, and pass blocking was his strength.
But what jumps out is that there's enough blame to go around. No one on the Steelers offensive line excelled in pass blocking consistently all year. Even Faneca, the Jets' new multi-millionaire, has been more and more susceptible to sacks in recent years.
If there is one group that may have gotten off lightly, it's the running backs. There were times on sacks where Steelers backs did not block well, but i didn't find one case where a running back's man was responsible for the initial hit. Considering the amount of plays where tight ends were kept in to block, Heath Miller and Matt Spaeth did pretty well, although Spaeth still has work to do in the running game.
And in case you're wondering, the no one category is for sacks on corner blitzes, overloads and all-out blitzes where no one could reasonably be asked to block the player credited with the sack. Those are cases where Roethlisberger and the receivers failed make a hot-read adjustment to get the ball away or in one case where Roethlisberger simply stepped out of bounds behind the line of scrimmage.
It is true that Ben Roethlisberger is sometimes worthy of blame as well because of his tendency to hold onto the ball. What we'll try to do in the next post is figure out how much of the problem lies with the line and how much is the fault of the Steelers QB.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-11-2008 @ 12:35AM
mike said...
http://www.secsportsfan.com/spygate-more-radio-communications-issues.html
IT STATES IN THIS ARTICLE BY (Johnny) of the SEC SPORTS FAN
'If someone living in Pennsylvania sees this posting, please forward it to Arlen Specter's congressional office. His site does not accept email submissions from out of state citizens'
Although I live in Denver, I came across this very intresting article and thought I'd pass it along. The article is some what old, so dont know if someone has already posted something on this subject or not. The article I believe was writin around march 08 but not to sure. All I can say is WOW! This is some scary stuff (well, for me atleast) What has the NFL gotten them selfs into.
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 6:18AM
tom bartoli said...
Thanks Coop.
It's pretty much what we've expected, a whole lot of blame spread over a whole lot of players. Hartwig has to be an upgrade. Smith should be fine. Komoeatu is probably less scary than Simmons at this stage. Certainly, he's a better bargain. And our RT's will need TE assistance.
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 1:07PM
BadMa'afala said...
This is a good analysis, and I'm looking forward to the rest of it. That's absolutely shocking that the Steelers' IOL gave up that many sacks. This info makes me wonder yet again why they're not giving Colon more of a look at guard. He could go from being a sub-par RT to being a big upgrade from Simmons at RG. Starks may not be a great RT, but I'll bet if he's in decent shape, he could do as well as Colon did last year.
Thanks for the look, JJ.
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 6:59PM
Luz said...
Great stuff.
Reply
6-14-2008 @ 5:31PM
Jeremy Kohlman said...
well, thanks for the breakdown. colon obviously needs replacing, and starks is the man for it. at least he can run block. colon would be better at guard.
justin hartwig should fix the center problem.
should NOT have gotten rid of faneca, his weak performance this past season was partially because of a horrible sean mahan and unhealthy marvel smith. lets hope chris kemoeatu reallys shows he is ready.
simmons needs replacing with a first round draft pick. no one the steelers currently have is capable of playing good there. sadly, simmons will start again.
hopeful OL:
LT- marvel smith
LG- chris kemoeatu
C- justing hartwig
RG- kendall simmons (only one available, maybe colon)
RT- max starks
Reply
6-15-2008 @ 3:28PM
doughenigin said...
Thanks for putting this together. I agree that Ben is likely responsible for a good number of the sacks, but on the flip side he is also responsible for shedding off a lot of would be sacks. Any chance you'd be up for the same type of analysis on hits & knockdowns to couple with this info? It would likely be directionally similar, so maybe not as much value in it, but still interesting nonetheless.
I'm looking forward to the breakdown of Ben's fault vs. the OL's fault...
Reply