Feedback  

Posts from the General Cfb Insanity Category at NCAA Football FanHouse

NCAA Football

Search FanHouse

Resources

Email our editors with your tips, corrections, complaints, inquiries, suggestions, etc.

Defensive Stats Win Championships

Anyone who has been watching football for more than about 30 seconds should realize that if you can't keep other teams from scoring, you'll eventually lose a shoot-out. When you do, your championship hopes take a huge nose-dive.

ESPN, though, found some commonalities between some of the recent BCS Title winners. Among them, a receiver averaging 15+ yards-per-catch, the team racking up 33 sacks, and a quarterback passing for 3,000 yards. Mergz at Saurian Sagacity thought, to be polite, that their method was nonsense.

Today he posted a fairly detailed analysis of team averages in statistical categories for BCS winners. The conclusion? There are only a few categories where BCS Champions share high rankings consistently. They're all defensive categories and the most pronounced among them is scoring defense.

Big shocker, there. Nevertheless, a good read. Go check it out for all the nuts and bolts.

Are Pre-Season Polls a Necessary Evil? (Pt. 1)


This is part one of a two-part look at the assumed worthlessness of the pre-season poll.

It's fashionable these days to decry the terribleness of the pre-season poll. After all, it is a travesty that young men like those on Auburn's 2004 team can best every challenge laid before them, and then be denied the right to play for the national championship because, before they had even stepped on the field, some voters didn't think they were going to be very good.

It's an easy argument to make. So easy, in fact, that most folks don't give the other side of it any thought at all. Unfortunately, the challenges encountered by Auburn in 2004 are present every year, and while it's easy to point the finger at early polling, it's really just a symptom of a much larger problem with the whole polling system.

Oklahoma Says Player Kicked Off the Football Team Is Actually a Transfer


When last we heard from rap impresario Josh Jarboe, he was being dismissed from the Oklahoma football team for having bad timing, questionable rapping skills, and a moron of a friend who posted the rap video on YouTube. Fine, Oklahoma felt they took a chance on the kid after an arrest for having a firearm. He showed more bad judgment in rapping about more firearms and using foul language, embarrassing the school and football program. Okay, time for everyone to move on.

Well, Jarboe did. He decided to go play for Troy in the Sun Belt Conference. Closer to home. Less attention. In a way, it makes sense as Oklahoma Coach Bob Stoops in the announcement that Jarboe was dismissed from the football team said, "We hope he can move forward in a positive manner."

Probably not a bad idea. Of course, Oklahoma isn't making it that easy.
According to Troy coach Larry Blakeney, Trojans wide receiver Josh Jarboe currently is not eligible to play this season after transferring from Oklahoma earlier this week.

Because OU told Troy officials that they didn't refuse him admission for the fall, Blakeney said, Jarboe is now being treated as a transfer student by the NCAA, with this season being his sit-out year.
Nice. Technically the NCAA rules are the problem, and Troy is appealing to the NCAA. After all,the NCAA is so reasonable about these things.

Still Oklahoma doesn't seem too interested in making it easy for Jarboe to "move forward in a positive manner." They dismissed him from the team -- which means losing the scholarship -- but also says since he was admitted, he is a transfer.

Again, he was dismissed from the football team. He didn't quit the team. No scholarship. Left Oklahoma before the fall semester as expected. So, now he's a transfer. Kafka sends his regards.

Suing The NCAA Is Big Business

It may take a while, and cost millions in attorney fees, but look at what can be squeezed from everyone's favorite all things to all people organization.
the NCAA will create a $10 million fund over the next three years to reimburse former student athletes for educational costs they previously incurred. The NCAA will also make an additional $218 million available to current Division I schools to pay for benefits given to college athletes enrolled between the 2007 and 2013 academic years.
I'm not a fan of big-dollar over-the-top litigation, but it's hard to be sympathetic towards the NCAA here. I don't necessarily think they need to pay athletes, but the time is coming soon to end the charade that they're really amateurs -- particularly when the NCAA gets shaken a little and over $200 million falls out.

Previously at FanHouse
NCAA President Myles Brand Is Paid $895,000 To Do What, Exactly?

(H/T: The Wizard of Odds)

Ben Mauk Will Force the NCAA To Explain It's Decision in Court

When Ben Mauk was denied an additional year of eligibility at Cincinnati, it was assumed that ended his quest for a 6th year. Mauk spent all of last weekend away from the Bearcats' training camp, and just out of sight. It was assumed that he was making calls to some NFL teams about a possible tryout or simply mulling his future.

Well, sort of. He was in consultation with lawyers and decided that if the NCAA was going to deny his final appeal without directly speaking to him, he would change the venue. He filed for and received a temporary restraining order in Ohio Common Pleas Court against the NCAA against prohibiting him from playing and practicing with Cincinnati. While that puts the NCAA in the position to respond at an August 22 hearing, Mauk won't be practicing at Cinci training camp at the moment.
[Cincinnati head coach Brian] Kelly said Thursday that if UC allows Mauk to practice and the NCAA eventually prevails in court, UC could be forced to forfeit games and return bowl money.

"Ben Mauk, myself and everybody else here will not go down that road," Kelly said. "That's ludicrous to even think that we would put him on the field and put our football team in harm's way."
As strange as this is, it isn't unprecedented.

Buckeyes Have a Bargain in Tressel; Hawkeyes Hoping Magic Beans Sprout Soon



Attention KMart shoppers: We have a blue light special in Columbus, where right now we're offering 22% off of national championship winning coaches.
So says Forbes, which is out with a list it calls The Best (And Worst) College Football Coaches For The Buck (slideshow warning). According to their algorithm, Jim Tressel's $2.6 million annual salary is under the market rate for coaches with similar achievements. The Buckeye boss should be making just under $3.2 million a year.

That sounds like a lot of money, mostly because it is. Yet Forbes says that even Pete Carroll (2007 compensation estimated at $4.4 million) is underpaid. They say Southern Cal's coach should be making about a Chevy Cobalt more than $5 million a year, based on his two national titles. (No word on how the Stanford loss affected his overall value, alas.)

So cheer up, Buckeye fans; you may have lost two straight BCS Title Games, but (a) you actually made it to two straight BCS Title Games, and (b) you didn't overpay for the privilege.

Of course, if somebody's underpaid, somebody's overpaid too. Who's the most overpaid coach in college football, according to Forbes? Hint: his name rhymes with "irk parents."

Bringing Back the Seattle Bowl

Ah, Seattle in December. The wind, the rain, the bowl game. Yeah, here we go again.
[The executive director for the Seattle Sports Commission, Ralph] Morton said his group is putting together a business plan for a new bowl game at Qwest Field that could apply for NCAA certification in 2009 and debut in 2010. "We're just taking this one step at a time," he said Tuesday. "We still have a long ways to go."
Hey, if you are going to dream, go big. The group wants to tie-in with the Pac-10 -- which already has seven bowl tie-ins -- and wants to be a high-tier bowl which means offering the big pay-out.

The late, unlamented Seattle Bowl lasted two seasons, but the Seattle Sports Commission swears this is unrelated. As beautiful a city as Seattle may be, December is not when it is at it's best. That is unless you think an average temperature of 41 degrees, wind and rain for almost 2/3 of the days is a big draw.

In that respect, having a big payout may be a necessity to get teams to show. The problem would be convincing fans to travel to Seattle for the game. The idea of a bowl game is to draw in fans from outside of the area to supposedly provide a boost to tourism and hotels.

If this bowl game were to happen, it would push the total up to 35 bowl games. At this rate, how soon until the NCAA lets 5-7 teams play?

Chick-Fil-A Is Coming, to Your GameDay

Home Depot remains the program's title sponsor (hooray, more free hard hats for the crowd), but the great, mostly Southern dining establishment that is Chick-Fil-A is changing the routine a bit.
The agreement [with ESPN] includes Chick-fil-A TV commercials during the show and a live shot of a Chick-fil-A fan interaction area. Event staff in "College GameDay" and Chick-fil-A co-branded uniforms will escort a crate carrying the mascot head for Corso's announcement.
Total cheese, but then so is the entire Lee Corso repertoire. This move should fit right in.

Chick-Fil-A now sponsors a bowl game (aptly named the Chick-fil-A Bowl in Atlanta) and will also sponsor the Chick-fil-A College Kickoff, an annual affair in Atlanta to begin the college football season. The normally secretive GameDay location dance is a wash as the article states GameDay will be in Atlanta for that game (August 30) during the first Saturday of college football this year.

Pete Carroll Faxes in His Anger (!!)

An early signing period may be coming to college football. In fact, in a recent American Football Coaches Association poll, 73% of coaches favored an AFCA recommendation for an early signing period. Signing Day would then shift from February to December. The AFCA sent those findings to coaches, and Pete Carroll flipped.
Carroll is especially upset - he faxed back his response with "this is a terrible change!!" scrawled across the bottom
Exclamation point exclamation point (!!). Nice.

I'm with Carroll on this one, the proposal would be ridiculously unfair to the athletes. It also likely furthers Carroll's opinion that other coaches are "lazy". Coaches are still being hired and fired after December, the season's not over, and not all players have been able to make recruiting visits or would rather make them once the high school and college football seasons have ended.

There's no reason to lock players into commitments especially when recruiting is a two-way, usually lengthy information gathering process. The greater amount of time given to it, the more all parties are able to gather about the other and make the best possible decision.

This is bad policy.

I've got a forum here at FanHouse to make my opinion known, but I admire Carroll's less nuanced Fax Machine Diplomacy. Maybe he's onto something.

Patent Office Declares USC Is the Real SC


The one in Los Angeles, of course. The University of South Carolina was founded in 1801, The University of Southern California in 1880, but the one in Los Angeles seems to have gained an edge in use of similar proprietary symbols.
On Friday, the local USC won an administrative tribunal that helped define who has rights to the "SC" logo, including the interlocking version. The case originated back in 2002.
Be sure to scan the comments section, South Carolina fans are amusingly miffed, but the cultural war's pretty much over as the California USC owns the usc.edu domain and is much more recognized nationally as "USC". Now, they legally control the "SC" as well. Anecdotal, I know, but relevant. South Carolina has telegraphed its understanding of this even before the ruling.
Earlier this year, the USC Gamecocks altered their official school color because of similarities with the USC Trojans. Both schools used the exact same manufacturing color codes for a varient of red known here in Los Angeles as "cardinal." While the change to another shade of red was subtle, school officials reportedly made the switch after research showed they had lost the brand identity battle in the eye of the public -- even in South Carolina.
I'm a bit biased, but the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office made the right decision here. That said, let's laugh at the official new USC and the hoops they must clear to protect their various intellectual property.
The University of Southern California loathes the moniker "Southern Cal," even though they make a limited run of "Southern Cal" branded apparel every year. The production is necessary for the school to retain its trademark and prevent anybody else from using it.