Elie Seckbach, the Embedded NBA Correspondent, brings his exclusive video reporting to FanHouse. Check back regularly for more videos.
In this exclusive video NBA players like Grant Hill, Derek Fisher and Carmelo Anthony talk about who would they want to see in the White House, Barack Obama or John McCain. We also hang out with Sacramento's Spencer Hawes, one of the biggest political enthusiasts in the NBA. Hawes, who is originally from Seattle, tells us how he became a Republican and why he won't watch CNN.
AOL Video link. Youtube link.
FanHouse
Blog Roll
- Armchair GM
- Awful Announcing
- Ballhype
- Barstool Sports
- Baseball Musings
- Brahsome
- Can't Stop the Bleeding
- D.C. Sports Bog
- Dan Shanoff
- Dave's Football Blog
- Deadspin
- Epic Carnival
- Every Day Should Be Saturday
- Foul Balls
- Free Darko
- Hardball Times
- Kissing Suzy Kolber
- Ladies ...
- Larry Brown Sports
- Lion in Oil
- Mondesi's House
- Most Valuable Network
- Mr. Irrelevant
- Off Wing Opinion
- Playing the Field
- Quick Hits
- Randball
- Rumors and Rants
- SB Nation
- Sports By Brooks
- Sportz Assassin
- The 700 Level
- The Big Lead
- The Big Picture
- The Extrapolater
- The Ghost of Wayne Fontes
- The Offside
- The Sports Hernia
- The Starting Five
- TrueHoop
- We Are the Postmen
- With Leather
- Yardbarker
- Y! Sports Blogs
Hardwood Pundits: NBA Players Weigh In On Obama vs. McCain
Hardwood Pundits: NBA Players Weigh In On Obama vs. McCain
Elie Seckbach, the Embedded NBA Correspondent, brings his exclusive video reporting to FanHouse. Check back regularly for more videos.
In this exclusive video NBA players like Grant Hill, Derek Fisher and Carmelo Anthony talk about who would they want to see in the White House, Barack Obama or John McCain. We also hang out with Sacramento's Spencer Hawes, one of the biggest political enthusiasts in the NBA. Hawes, who is originally from Seattle, tells us how he became a Republican and why he won't watch CNN.
AOL Video link. Youtube link.
Perkins and Rondo Will Both Go Tonight, But Which Way?
From the AP comes news that both Kendrick Perkins and Rajon Rondo will go tonight in Game 6 of the NBA Finals in Boston. What does this mean? Well, Perkins is nursing a shoulder injury, which is not a best-case injury scenario when you're talking about a guy that's on the floor to provide a physical presence. Perkins' absence was noticeable in Game 5 as the Laker repeatedly, and finally, built an advantage on the offensive glass with Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom. Perkins is playing to try and erase that deficit, but with Gasol's height advantage over, well, everyone, having a bum shoulder could cause issues.
Conversely, Rondo's suffering with a bum ankle, and that's equally as unfortunate for his skill set. His big advantage over Derek Fisher is his speed and athleticism, and if that's limited, he's just an awkward young point guard who has trouble shooting.
However, the gamble is definitely worth it if the two are really healthy enough to play, obviously. The real question comes if they aren't. Doc Rivers is notorious for his rotation issues, and will often leave guys in too long before making the necessary adjustment. Will he be able to pull the plug tonight if he needs to? Will he have to?
Sure, the Celtics Can Improve After Their Game 3 Performance. So Can the Lakers.

There's a prevailing assertion out there today after the Lakers' "ugly" Game 3 victory that goes along these lines: Hey, the Celtics couldn't have played much worse, and they still had a chance to win! Ray Allen was quoted afterwards as saying "The solace in this whole thing for us is we know we can be better." Well, the Lakers can be better, too.
The Celtics still might be the better team, and they have the 2-1 series lead to go along with home court advantage. So it's not like the Lakers are going to be over-celebrating a gritty six-point victory that Boston had a shot at winning until the very end. But so much has been said about the poor play of Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett, that people seem to be overlooking all of the following things that went wrong for the Lakers:
- Kobe Bryant missed seven of his 18 free throw attempts. Like that's ever happening again. And the Lakers as a team shot just 61% from the foul line, so there's obviously plenty of room for improvement there.
- The Lakers' four starters not named Kobe combined to shoot 7-28 from the field for the game, a dismal 25%. Again, that's not likely to continue. Between Odom, Fisher, and Gasol, you can expect at least one of those guys to show up for the next game at home, right? (Well, okay, maybe not Gasol.)
NFL Stars and Celebs Have Tips for the Lakers
Elie Seckbach, the Embedded NBA Correspondent, brings his exclusive NBA reporting to FanHouse. Check back here regularly for more videos.
In this video we talk to Football great Michael Strahan as well as Entertainers about the NBA finals. Around 2:20 into the video we find out from Marcellus Wiley who is cooler, NFL players or NBA players.
Youtube link.
Game 1: On Boston's Vicious Defense

In the long-form tradition of The Rotation, Tom Ziller considers the action the morning after each game of the NBA Finals.
Tempo is a funky thing in organized basketball. Most associate high-speed offensive attacks with energy and intensity. Meanwhile, slow defensive stalwarts are assumed to be boringly consistent and Spursian. (Yech.)
But Boston -- with an incredibly stolid system, and an attack slower than Eddy Curry in zero-gravity -- has a defense that's exciting. Where San Antonio and Detroit plod and push and prod, Boston bites and gnashes and fights. This defense is bloodthirsty, and that's something the Lakers haven't faced before.
FanHouse Roundtable: The Finals Are Here!

Team NBA FanHouse got together to discuss the series ahead. Be sure to join Brett Edwards' Game 1 live blog tonight shortly before the 9 p.m. Eastern tip.
Matt Moore: Thank you, Basketball Jesus, the day has finally arrived. What's crazy is that with all the hype, this isn't just a single game, nay, we've got possibly seven of these things. Let's start off with some nuts and bolts. What's the one matchup on either side you see as the biggest mismatch?
NBA Endgame: Breaking It Down by Position

NBA Endgame will preview Celtics-Lakers from all angles. Right now: the obligatory position-by-position breakdown.
In looking at the way the Celtics and Lakers will match up with each other by position, I'm going with the traditional breakdown -- as opposed to who may be actually matched up against each other -- because that's likely to change as the series goes on. We'll be taking a deeper look at some of those individual matchups over the next couple of days, but in the meantime, here's an overview of the starters for both teams.
PG: Derek Fisher (LA) vs Rajon Rondo (BOS): Rondo's quickness and playmaking ability are a big plus, but his unwillingness to shoot the ball when he's open has hurt the Celtics at times. Fisher's playoff heroics are well-documented, and the veteran definitely won't be rattled playing in his fourth NBA Finals. Advantage: Lakers
SG: Kobe Bryant (LA) vs Ray Allen (BOS): This matchup might be closer than you think, at least in terms of how it may affect their respective teams. Kobe's going to get his, but If Ray Allen can find some consistency in this series and at least force Kobe to expend some energy on the defensive end of the floor, he could even this one out a bit. But if Allen isn't hitting his shots, Kobe will be able to cheat off of him and provide some help defense, which will obviously make things tougher for people like Paul Pierce. Advantage: Lakers
NBA Sets a Bad Precedent by Issuing Statement on Officiating

An NBA spokesman, commenting on the play involving Brent Barry and Derek Fisher at the end of Game 4 between the Lakers and Spurs, stated that, "With the benefit of instant replay, it appears a foul should have been called." While that might make some astute (if admittedly petty) observers of the game happy, I think it sets a bad precedent and will only create more controversy for a league that already has so many of its foul calls questioned on a nightly basis.
If we're going to look at a call that could have decided the game, why not examine the play before that? Derek Fisher's shot on that possession (with seconds left on the clock) was ruled to be an airball, when it clearly (again, with the benefit of instant replay) hit the rim. The shot clock should have been reset, which would have forced the Spurs to foul, which could have pushed the Laker lead up to four. Had that play been ruled correctly, we likely wouldn't even be talking about a controversy on the game's final play.
Do you see the problem with this? We could go back through every possession and find plenty of calls throughout the game that were questionable. Because the game's final possession is always magnified, the league felt the need to comment on it. But they really shouldn't have. Not unless they want whining about officiating to take over the game.
NBA Admits the Spurs Got Screwed Out of a Chance to Tie Game 4
So you know that controversial ending in Game 4 of the Western Conference Finals? My colleague Brett Edwards argued there not a foul; last night, the NBA respectfully disagreed.Trailing 93-91 on Tuesday night, the Spurs inbounded the ball with 2.1 seconds left to Brent Barry, who was bumped by Los Angeles Lakers guard Derek Fisher on the floor. No foul was called, and Barry missed badly on a 3-pointer before time expired.I'm glad the league stepped up and did the right thing. I mean, this all the Spurs really wanted, right? A little apologizing goes a long way. In fact, I'm sure it makes the sting of being down 3-1 instead of all tied up actually quite bearable ... right?
[...] "With the benefit of instant replay, it appears a foul should have been called," NBA spokesman Tim Frank said.
Of course not! The Spurs got screwed, plain and simple. The fact the league is sheepishly hanging its head saying "my bad" doesn't change a thing. Sure, chalk one up for transparency, but only if you chalk another one up for bad officiating dictating the outcome of a game -- and possibly the entire series. This apology is too little, too late.
