Posts tagged JoeMorgan at FanHouse

FanHouse Home Run Derby Live Chat


Admit it, you think it's cool that the Home Run Derby's in Yankee Stadium tonight. The thought of Josh Hamilton launching a ball into Monument Park has you just a little more geeked than you want to admit. Truth be told, you like home runs and the Derby has a ton of them. Maybe you're an NL fan that wants to see Evan Longoria and Josh Hamilton in action, or an AL fan that's curious if Dan Uggla can really be that good. And making fun of Chris Berman and Joe Morgan, well, that's just plain fun.

Anyways, come along after the jump where I'll be joined by a number of FanHouse luminaries while we chat live during the Home Run Derby, giving you the hard hitting analysis you want for the most meaningless event this side of the Slam Dunk Contest. I'll be kicking the chat off around 7:30 while the Derby starts at 8.

Joe Morgan Is NBC's 'Whiner of the Week'

Just like Brian Powell, I had no clue that NBC Sports actually handed out a "Whiner of the Week" award. Had I known, I would have been following this sooner. Anyway, this week's winner is a highly regarded figure of the sports blogosphere, a gentleman that really needs no introduction, because of his strengths in the announcing booth and the dedication to learning all the nuances of the game of baseball. That's right: Dr. Joseph Morgan.
"Part of the reason the game doesn't bring that energy is it's a different game now. Now it's considered an exhibition, whereas before it was considered life and death," Morgan whimpered to reporters during a conference call in which he was supposed to be plugging the game for ESPN.

Morgan wants the stars to play all nine innings, like Willie Mays and Hank Aaron used to do. That will make everything better, he says.

Well, it ain't gonna happen, and somebody should tell Morgan that. It's not necessarily worse. It's just different. And ratings are down because ratings are down for everything. That's what happens when you have 400 channels to watch.

So keep your nostalgic whimpering to yourself, Joe. Nobody wants to hear it.

Yowza. Good to know that Joe isn't heavily favored with the Peacock. And I figured he was so popular with the mainstream. It's an understandable reaction though -- on both sides. Joe, predictably, hates change. (Even if it's for the better!) We -- meaning people not over the age of 50 -- prefer that our game today not be knocked.

Although I am interested in this award. Where was Joe Buck's last week? Will Colin Cowherd be receiving a lifetime achievement award? And I assume the winner get a bottle of ... wine.

Bobby Jenks Will Avoid the DL

Make no mistake about it, the reason the Chicago White Sox are in first place in their division is their pitching staff. The White Sox have the best team ERA in baseball at 3.39, and it could be argued that the Dotel-Linebrink-Jenks combination at the back of the bullpen is the best in baseball (I heard Joe Morgan say it, so it has to be true).

So with the Twins refusing to get off their backs, the Sox can't really afford to lose any of their pitchers, and they got some good news on Saturday when they found out Bobby Jenks won't have to spend any time on the disabled list.
The White Sox were concerned enough about the tightness in Bobby Jenks' upper left back that they ordered an MRI and CTScan Saturday. The results were negative and Jenks should be ready to pitch in the Kansas City series starting Tuesday.

The Sox bullpen closer has not appeared since last Sunday against the Cubs, when he allowed a hit and walk but escaped with no runs. Though the tightness is not in his throwing shoulder, it was painful enough that it affected his performance.
It was in that game against the Cubs that the team noticed Jenks was only hitting 91-93 on the radar gun, down from his normal 95-96 range, and became concerned. Considering the struggles that Scott Linebrink has had when he's filled in during 9th innings this season, this is very good news for the White Sox, though it's probably a situation they'll be keeping their eye on.

Ron Santo's Hall of Fame Chances Improving

Ron Santo is one of the Hall of Fame's most glaring omissions. He's the kind of guy who's been overlooked thanks to his position, his success in non-traditional areas, and the curse of being stuck on some truly terrible 1960's Cubs teams. Santo should be in, and it's a shame he's had to wait 20 years for it.

That might be happening soon. According to the Chicago Sun-Times (via BBTF) the Hall of Fame voting will be different this year -- instead of selecting 10 names from 20-25 and shooting for 75 percent, voters will vote both in the initial vote and then again for the top ten names. Because Santo has been the leading non-Hall vote getter for years, his chances of making it in a smaller field sound pretty good.

What's ironic about this is the man leading the charge: Joe Morgan. Joe knows Santo's case is partially based in his OBP and slugging percentage, right? But those are funny acronyms! OPS? Pshhhh!

Joe Morgan Insults Ernie Banks

ESPN Sunday Night Baseball analyst and baseball Hall-of-Famer Joe Morgan isn't exactly the most beloved figure in baseball or the blogosphere. I mean, the man has a blog dedicated to rooting out the idiocy in the sports media coverage of the game named after him (I live for the day I write something stupid enough for FJM to attack me).

The reason for this is that Joe says a lot of things that are poorly-informed or just outright incorrect. The latest instance took place on Sunday night while Joe was working the Cubs/White Sox game.
In the fifth inning, when Eric Patterson hit a two-run homer into the wire basket that overhangs the right field wall, Morgan referred to the basket as "Banks Boulevard," and then went on to talk about how many Ernie Banks homers ended up in the Wrigley bleacher baskets back in the day - the implication being, of course, that many of Ernie's 512 career homers were cheapies, and that he would have hit considerably fewer without the help of those right- and left-field baskets.
It turns out that "Banks Boulevard" is a phrase that Joe has been using for a while when describing the nets at Wrigley Field, and that he maintains that's what "everybody" referred to them as while he played.

Just one slight problem: the baskets weren't put in at Wrigley Field until 1970, and Banks retired after the 1971 season. How many of Ernie's 512 career homers came at Wrigley during that span? Seven, including his 500th which was hit well into the seats.

This discrepancy has caused Cubs blogs and fans to threaten boycotting ESPN until Morgan issues an apology, and though I find that to be incredibly idiotic, I still offer my full support for the movement. I'll do anything that could possibly lead to not having to deal with Joe anymore.

(Arm bash to Walkoff Walk)

On Deck: Here Come the Tigers



On Deck is FanHouse's look at the day's most intriguing baseball matchups

San Francisco Giants (30-40) vs. Detroit Tigers (32-37) - 10:05PM Est.

It's been a very odd year for the Detroit Tigers. After getting off to a horrible start this season, there have been times when they seem to be getting their act together and then suddenly they're horrible again in the blink of an eye. As Joe Morgan would probably say if you asked him about it, "I'm friends with Gary Sheffield." "They're consistently inconsistent."

Still, after sweeping the division-leading Chicago White Sox last week, I asked the question if this was the start of the Tigers turnaround. Was it a sign of things to come?

Well, the Tigers didn't stop there as they followed that sweep with another one against the Dodgers this weekend, and they've now won six in a row to creep back into the race.

Dr. Joe Morgan: Consistantly Educating Himself

The easy way out would be to mock Joe Morgan for getting another degree. And then mocking those that gave it to him even more. But that's really more of a job for someone else. Still, if you have ever watched him type in a chat or talk about certain aspects of the game, it is fairly humorous that Morgan is being granted bonus degrees from someone.
The baseball Hall of Famer and two-time NL Most Valuable Player received an honorary doctorate of humane letters Saturday from California State University, East Bay-the school where the Bay Area native earned his bachelor's degree after his 22-year playing career ended.

[...]'I've always felt that the quality of your life is directly related to the quality of your education,' said Morgan, who earned his bachelor's degree in 1990. 'If you continue your education, I believe you'll continue to improve the quality of your life.'
Now, more to the point of why this is actually a good thing; Morgan apparently returned -- and I was unaware of this -- to get his bachelor's degree after playing baseball for 22 years. He had no reason to; certainly he had made enough money over that time to retire. But he promised his parents he would get the degree and he followed up on that promise.

And now the university that gave him the degree decided to "further" his education in an honorary fashion. And when a famous alumni gives you over $150,000 in endowment money, you make sure that you give him publicity props. And that's especially fine as long as they are basing such publicity on his pre-announcing career.

Orlando Cabrera Feels Neglected

Yesterday we found out about White Sox shortstop Orlando Cabrera's recent habit of calling the press box and arguing about errors he was charged with. The arguing worked, as both calls were overturned by official scorers, but Orlando's manager wasn't too fond of the way Orlando was handling things.

Ozzie Guillen stepped out of character and actually shared his thoughts and feelings with the media by expressing his concern about how Orlando's teammates and White Sox fans would react to the news he was so concerned about his statistics. Especially considering that the Sox are currently a first place team, and that it might make it seem like Orlando was more concerned with his next contract than the White Sox winning.

Well, Orlando did not appreciate Ozzie's concern.
"If it happens again, I will call again," Cabrera said. "I don't have to do it with other teams because they always had my back. They don't want to do it here, I can take care of my own business. If you have a problem with what I did, come to me and say something. Don't go to the media to send a message, because he didn't send any message."

"I never had anybody complain about that stuff. If there was a major-league player who tells me he's not selfish, he's lying. Everyone is selfish about numbers, because that's the only thing people cannot lie about. That's it. It's not a big deal. I don't know who's trying to make this a big deal. Maybe it's the media, maybe it's the manager. And nobody is complaining about that stuff. Nobody cares about that."
This could get interesting.

Sunday Night Baseball: On Instant Replay, Carlos Delgado and Joe Morgan

If you're watching the game on ESPN right now, you're doubtlessly aware that Carlos Delgado had a home run stolen from him thanks to baseball's stubborn refusal to accept that there are actual ways of knowing whether balls are fair or foul. And his was fair. Be you a Met fan, Yankee fan or Padre fan, there's no doubt about it after seeing the replay dozens of times.

Of course, the umpires aren't allowed to watch the replay even once. I'm not proposing instant replay across the board. Safe and out, ball and strike - these are, by rule of the game, judgment calls. They are, and should remain, prone to human nature. Fair or foul, though? That's factual. That should be reviewed because there's no judgment involved.

Joe Morgan, of course, disagrees. He doesn't think replay would work because "every play would be reviewed." He also thought the reason the umps blew the call was because the bottom of the foul pole was painted black rather than yellow. Which would make sense if the ball was black but even Morgan would probably concede that it's white with red stitches. And I'll concede that what he says about every play being reviewed could be true. Only if someone as dumb as Morgan was the one writing the rules about how replay can be used but, hey, anything's possible.

Joe Morgan's Latest Bit of Brilliant Analysis



Thanks to the video genius that is Awful Announcing, here's a rather salient video from last night of Joe Morgan doing what Joe Morgan does best: weak analysis.

On the whole, Morgan's argument isn't that bad. Without realizing it, Joe cites the problem of small sample size -- the oh-so-revolutionary notion that crazy things sometimes happen over 15 games -- as the most likely reason for Ortiz's slump so far this season. Then he talks about "pressure" and "other people looking at you" and "newspapers" and all sorts of stuff that probably isn't nearly as big of a deal as Joe thinks, but which are still at least somewhat accurate.

But to open the way he does -- saying he hasn't seen Papi's swing enough to offer an opinion (!) -- is everything that is wrong with Morgan the analyst. He watches baseball for a living. He's at the ballpark every day. Is it too tough to get one of ESPN's production interns to put together a little film review? How about stopping by batting practice and watching Ortiz hit? Asking Ortiz how his swing feels? Asking the front office for an early assessment? Are we getting warmer here? No? Bueller?

Any of the above would qualify as an attempt at baseball analysis. Joe chose none.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Fantasy Football
ADVERTISEMENT