MLB




New! Sports Videos

Video on AOL

Fantasy Football 2008 Draft Kit

Fantasy Football Draft Kit

Need to get an edge in your fantasy football league? Don't forget to check out our FREE Fantasy Football Draft Kit.

  1. Get Draft Help Now

    The Dugout

    Read the latest baseball satire from the warped minds of
    The Dugout.

    Moneyball Now a Bush-League Approach

    By KEVIN B. BLACKISTONE
    ,
    AOL
    posted: 43 DAYS 19 HOURS AGO
    comments: 0
    filed under: MLB
    Text SizeAAA
    Sports Commentary
    Two years ago, the Oakland A's achieved something they hadn't done since the early '90s: they won a playoff series.
    They then did what they've really become known for since the turn of the millennium: they cashed in their future
    They let ace Barry Zito go after that postseason breakthrough. They traded the pitcher who emerged in 2007 as Zito's heir apparent, Dan Haren, at the start of this season. And in just the past two weeks, they swapped half of their rotation -- Joe Blanton and Rich Harden -- for more of what Harden, Blanton, Haren and Zito once were: prospects.
    Grow. Trim. Start all over again. It is Oakland's GM Billy Beane's mad method to putting together a successful baseball team with lesser resources than big-city teams. It was celebrated in Michael Lewis' best-selling book "Moneyball."
    That was then. This is now.
    Moneyball is bankrupt.
    To be sure, the A's on Monday night not only lost their sixth consecutive game but dropped it to a team, Tampa, that is even more miserly than it is. With the second-cheapest payroll in baseball, Tampa is scrapping with the Red Sox for American League East supremacy. It may even be looking to make a deal for a player that can help it over the hump now.
    Tampa can afford to now. So can the A's. So can any team.
    The economics of baseball aren't what they were for so long. They have been evolving, almost radically, since about the time Beane took over the A's. Revenues by franchises started being shared about 10 years ago. And revenues have been going up and up.
    Smaller city teams like the A's no longer have to rob Peter to pay Paul. They can pay Paul and deliver Peter to their fans too. To do anything less no longer holds water. Even Lewis, as assistant professor of marketing at Washington University in St. Louis, alluded to as much a year ago in a release from the school about baseball's revenue sharing plan upon its 10th anniversary.
    In pointing out flaws in the system, Lewis noted, somewhat ironically given this week's series between the A's and Rays: "The ... Rays have been notorious for under-investing in their team. In 2006, they collected $33 million in revenue-share payments and they only filled about 37 percent of the seats in ballpark. Clearly this is a team that has decided to grow the bottom line through revenue-sharing payments rather than grow the fan base."
    That would be better applied to the A's this season. Going into the All-Star break, the surprising Rays had drawn 930,000 fans to their home field, coolly nicknamed The Trop. The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported merchandise sales were up 70 percent. Fox Sports Network said Rays' broadcasts were breaking ratings' records.
    It shouldn't be amazing what winning can do for a sports franchise. That's what playing games is supposed to be all about. It's not supposed to be merely about economics. Indeed, Lewis argued further last year that baseball's revenue-sharing plan should do more to reward success on the field rather than frugality in the front office.
    "Under our plan, with 37 percent of the stadium filled, Tampa Bay's revenue sharing payment would have decreased to $13.5 million," Lewis said. "But if they had filled 70 percent of the stadiums, the revenue sharing payment would have been $25.1 million. If they had increased attendance to 80 percent, the payment would have been just short of $31 million."
    This year, Tampa's attendance is up; the A's is down.
    Moneyball is now a vicious cycle for A's fans. Hope springs eternal and so, too, unfortunately does the slash-and-burn method of farming to fertilize the field for the future. Then it is slashed and burned again.
    If there is one reason the Braves were so consistently good during the '90s it was because management was so consistently patient. It found young pitchers and young players, allowed them to maturate and reaped the benefits along the way. So many young pitchers - remember Tim Hudson and Mark Mulder? - and players the A's developed are found scattered across fields all over baseball. I suspect that will happen to the latest prospects the A's picked up for their players who were prospects just a few seasons ago.
    Maybe that's why the A's now look something like the Rays long did - a team with few fans for a future with only a wishful forecast.
    Kevin B. Blackistone is a panelist on ESPN's Around the Horn, a host on XM Satellite Radio, a frequent sports opinionist on other outlets and the Shirley Povich Chair in Sports Journalism at the Philip Merrill College of Journalism at the University of Maryland. A former award-winning sports columnist for The Dallas Morning News, he currently lives in Hyattsville, Md.
    2008 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
    2008-07-22 15:17:05


    Bookmark:

    Recent Comments

    1 - 4 of 4
    4 comments

    jsngmpz 01:28:06 PM Jul 24 2008

    The Red Sox have taken a divergent path from the A's. They do not employ the "Moneyball" technique as portrayed in Lewis' book. Unlike the A's the Sox have put substantial emphasis on the bullpen. Now they're even stealing bases and sacrificing which is an anathema to Moneyball.

    jdsalinger12 03:38:16 PM Jul 23 2008

    Kevin Blackistone is way off base here. At the end of the day, a sports franchise is like any other business: the goal is to make money. Baseball owners have always been trying to find ways to make more money: see the additional of lights for night games and the whole Black Sox scandal. In fact, Moneyball has been very effective for the As. The reason it has not had as much success now is because other teams like the Red Sox have started to do the same things. To me it seems Kevin's article is a bit unfair here. There is more than one way to win and the fact is if the teams did not see value in this, they would stop doing it.Best,Jack Elliotthttp://www.baseballtrainingtechniques.com

    pladd 02:07:57 PM Jul 23 2008

    Does White Castle spent crazy money so it can compete with McDonald's? Of course not. So why should the the small-market teams do the same to keep pace with the Cubs, Mets and Red Sox -- never mind the Yankees? The average fan should applaud their fiscal responsibility and buck a system that is stacked in the favor of selected markets.

    necamw 12:02:49 PM Jul 23 2008

    This is why I love Mark Attanasio and the Brewers owners and hated the Seligs - the willingness to spend some money to field a team with a chance at winning ball games. Now the Brewers should have over 3 million in attendance this year.

    1 - 4 of 4
    4 comments

    Add your own Comments





    Play Fantasy Football

    Latest Baseball Photos

    Latest Baseball Photos
    AP

    Get the the latest images from the world of Major League Baseball.

    Bizarre Baseball Injuries

    Bizarre Baseball Injuries
    AP

    Check out an odd assortment of ailments from the world of baseball.