Currently experiencing technical difficulties. Please refresh page or try again later.

Brady Looking Like Best Quarterback Ever

By JIM ARMSTRONG,
AOL
Posted: 2008-05-08 11:08:26
Filed Under: NFL, Voices
Sports Commentary

If it hasn’t already started, it will any day now.

Tom Brady
Jim McIsaac, Getty Images

Tom Brady won the MVP award this season with his strong performance, but he's also been impressive in years where he doesn't have the quality reciever to throw to.


The national media questioning the Patriots, that is. Are they vulnerable? Have they created a monster by running the table during the regular season? Will they trip over their press clippings in the playoffs?

This just in: no.

Why? Seven years into one of the greatest runs in NFL history, the time has come to answer that question. The Pats are going to win again this year, and for the same reason they won all those other years.

His name is Tom Brady.

No, he isn’t the only reason they’ve won and will continue to win. But he’s the biggest one. Just ask the 1985 Bears and 2000 Ravens, teams that had the NFL’s best defenses over the past quarter century, but won only one Super Bowl apiece.

Moral to the story: You can get to the top of the pro football universe without a great quarterback, but you can’t stay there.

The Patriots have won three Super Bowls with Brady and will win a fourth this year. And there’s a grand total of zero reasons to think they won’t win another next year. Who knows? By the time they’re done, they could have six or seven.

Photo Gallery

Bill Kostroun, AP

Patriots' Road
To Perfection

1 of 18    

Game 1 - Patriots 38, Jets 14
Randy Moss makes a spectacular Pats debut. He has 183 receiving yards and a score, but the subsequent "Spygate" controversy would make more headlines.


So why is it that so many people still question them? Why are we just getting around to giving Brady and his teammates credit? How is it that, from 2001-06, when the Pats won three out of six Super Bowls, they won two out of 42 possible post-season awards?

My best guess is because Bill Belichick, whose next smile in public will be his first, makes it nearly impossible to pull for the Pats. As if that really matters. As if Belichick’s press-conference persona, hobo hoodie and issues with the league office should impact how anyone feels about his team.

What do you say, with their fourth Super Bowl almost upon us, we start to truly appreciate the Pats’ greatness? And let’s start with Brady, the man who, more than any other, makes New England the team to beat.

He’s coming off the greatest season ever by a quarterback, throwing for a record 50 touchdowns and leading the league in completion percentage (68.9) and passing yardage (4,806). He even completed a pass to a Victoria’s Secret supermodel.

As gawdy as those numbers are, they’re more ironic than impressive. This is Brady we’re talking about. Before this season, his career was defined more by true grit than sheer greatness. He was the quarterback with the rings, not the numbers. Peyton Manning was the one with all the stats, but only one Super Bowl to call his own.

Strange as is may sound, having seen the numbers Brady has put up with Randy Moss and Wes Welker around, I’m not so sure we shouldn’t be more impressed by his 2006 season, when he threw 24 touchdown passes to a motley crew of weekly waiver-wire candidates.

So now, having reached 30, Brady is the complete package, the stats having caught up to the Super Bowls. But that doesn’t begin to tell the story. It has come to this for Brady: He belongs in the conversation of the greatest quarterback that ever was.

Which is to say, in the same sentence as Joe Montana.


Forget the stats. You can’t always trust numbers in the NFL. If you could, Vinny Testaverde and Dave Krieg would be considered two of the greatest quarterbacks ever.

This isn’t Major League Baseball, where the best player always has the best numbers, but doesn’t always win. (Good morning, A-Rod.) In the NFL, it’s just the opposite: The best player usually doesn’t have the best stats, but almost always wins.

That’s why, in the end, it can’t be about numbers. It’s more about a feeling. In the form of a question, it would read something like this: If your season, your life or your bank account depended on winning a game, which quarterback would you want taking the snaps?

With one Super Bowl victory, Manning can’t be in that discussion. Frankly, Montana always has been the choice here, but now I’m not so sure. And that’s with Brady standing on the cusp of his fourth Super Bowl, which would match Joe Cool’s jewelry collection.

What if he wins another one? Or, with no end in sight to the Pats’ dominance, another six or seven?

What then?

Then there shouldn’t be any debate.

Jim Armstrong is a sports columnist for The Denver Post. Feel free to e-mail him at dontmissjim@aol.com.

2008 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved.
2007-12-25 18:17:01
Bookmark:

Recent Comments

1 - 10 of 173
173 comments

skoolbeans 12:08:32 PM Jan 13 2008

So Tom Brady is simply best huh.
Pats will win super bowl huh.
Got to go through champs first. Colts, then possibly best of all time, a guy name Frave.

theseatwizard 10:41:14 AM Jan 13 2008

I'm always amused by the armchair QBs who wax nostalgic about past glories while at the same time making their missives both redundant and ironic. Some would deem them imbeciles and I'd be hard-pressed not to disagree. Case in point:, Stepa's inane babbbling with a sprikling of BFMGoalie tossed in. Granted, Johnny U, Starr, Tittle...great QBs of their era. But those boys were being tackled by an average line of 250 pounds and linebackers who checked in under 2 bucks on occasion. Not to mention their speed! At his best, Butkus ran the 40 in about a week and a half. Now you have 300#ers with 5.0 speed and lines that AVERAGE over 300#...it's apples/oranges. As for no running game, Stepa? Not that you didn't sound like someone who should be covering womens softball already, but did you see Maroney with 130 yards last night? Geez...your brilliance would be better used commenting on computer games

salesplussue 08:39:38 AM Jan 13 2008

Tom Brady just continues to win and set records at the same time. A 92% completion rating in a playoff game to Jacksonville - a team with a pretty solid defense (6th overall in the AFC). It's just another reason why, if he stays healthy and continues playing another 5 seasons, Tom Brady will be ranked as the best quarterback of all time. I have been a Joe Montana fan for as long as I can remember because he set the bar for other quarterbacks during the 80's, but Tom Brady is now on track to go another step beyond Montana. Players like Brady, Montana, John Elway and Brett Favre have proven that while it's important to be athletic, the best asset for the quarterback position is the mind. All of them have displayed other-worldly decision making skills - especially when the game is on the line.

kobdog1 09:38:06 PM Jan 12 2008

...

kobdog1 09:37:49 PM Jan 12 2008

BTW Brady is equivelant to lil wyane in the rap game right now...THE BEST

kobdog1 09:37:29 PM Jan 12 2008

Tom Brady is the best quarterback of all time...hes a huge pimp....classy as he ***** on everyone

bearbosse 01:33:10 PM Jan 12 2008

Until Joe Montana came along I always thought that Johnny Unitas was the greatest qb of all time. And I think that one could still make that argument. However, in general I would have amend that sentiment in acknowlegement of the fact that the game has changed over the decades so that it would be more accurate to state that Johnny Unitas was the greatest qb of the first 25 years of the NFL, with Joe Montana being the greatest of the second 25 years--the modern NFL having come into being in 1950 in the form of the merger with the old All American Conference. Taken together, Unitas and Montana are the "gold standard" against which all qbs are measured. The comparisons, however, are invidious. The game of pro football during the first 25 years when Unitas reigned (1950-1975) was played differently than the game that was played during Montana's reign (1975-2000). Unitas was a classic drop-back qb who basically called his own signals and was a "coach on the field". Montana's agility combi

bfmgoalie 10:17:01 AM Jan 12 2008

Today, 16 games vs. 12 of the past. No aggressive hitting the QB, running backs, receivers, etc. No blocks lower then the waist. Can't tackle by grabbing someone by the back of the pads or God forebid, wrapping your arm around a runner's neck! Gimme a break! Johnny U, Bart Starr, just to name a few would tear up today's records. And the running records? Imagine if Jimmy Brown played 16 games a year and for 12,13,14 years. Ha! Don't compare today's stars with yesterdays. Gimme Dick Butkus, Ray Nitscke, Mike Curtis, Lee Roy Jordan, Tommy Nobis over the Ray Lewis' of today. How about Jack Tatum?

Greatest games ever? Dallas/Detroit playoff game. Remember the score? It was 5-3. With today's rules, games like that are frowned upon. Its more important to run the score up, like the Patriots did that this year!

Oh, I am a Colts fan. But I will not compare today's teams versus the teams which established this league. Back then, it was about your team. Today, its about bucks. How sad all sport

porge125 08:20:13 AM Jan 12 2008

if brady had played under the same rules as johnny unitas the great quarterback of years ago he would be held in the same breath, now you can't hardly touch a quarterback and the recievers you can't touch them either, how would brady ever play under those conditions, there's a long line brady has to get into before he's considered great

stepa 08:10:33 AM Jan 12 2008

The Patriots are the embodiment of Madden Football 07! Caricutures of football players with absolutely no personality at all. Bill Belichick has all the grace, glow and charm of a hooded cobra and he takes all the fun out of actully being 16-0 and possible winning a super bowl. You cannot even start to compare Brady with Montana or the imortal Johnny U, the greatest QB of all time. Johnny U wasn't protected with all thes sissy rules that protect QBs and receivers today. Helmet to helmet hit - no problem! Crack-back block? Be my guest. I'm sick of all these creampuff, marshmellow rules of today. Don't even try to compare Brady with the QBs of yesteryear. It's like having a foul shooting contest in basketball and the winner makes 95-100 and all of a sudden you're comparing him with Rick Barry. Barry did it under game conditions when he was fatigued and sometimes injured. The slob who hit the 95-100 just stood at some foul line, all rested, and made shots with nothing on the line. You do

1 - 10 of 173
173 comments

Add your own Comments